You have firewalls, VPNs, backups and you're sure everything is running smoothly? That would be nice. Many security gaps lurk where you don't expect them – in misconfigured servers, overlooked services or outdated software. This article shows you how to put your IT infrastructure to a realistic test – with pentests that aren't just secure on paper.
1. Why IT infrastructure is more than servers and switches
If, when you hear “IT infrastructure,” you only think of your server room, a few routers and maybe the cloud environment – then you only have half the picture. Modern IT infrastructure is a complex beast: it connects people, devices, systems and data flows – across locations, time zones and security zones.
Your infrastructure doesn't just include physical components like firewalls, NAS systems, switches or backups. Virtual machines, containers, APIs, SaaS solutions, mobile devices, home office access, the admin's network scanners or the smart thermostats in the meeting room are part of it too. And this is exactly where the danger lurks.
Because the more you integrate, the larger your attack surface becomes. Many companies constantly tinker with their infrastructure, patch something here, set up a new service there – and eventually lose track. Security gaps often arise not from malicious negligence, but from everyday hecticness, missing documentation or blind trust in “it'll be fine.”
The problem: attackers have exactly that on their radar. They systematically scan the network, spot weaknesses faster than you'd suspect – and exploit them ruthlessly. So if you want to know whether your IT infrastructure is truly stable, you need to test it regularly under real conditions. Not with good faith, but with real attacks.
2. What exactly does a pentest give you – and when should you start?
A pentest is not an annoying mandatory appointment like the T??V inspection for the server room – it's a real reality check. You don't get a list of theoretical risks, but see in black and white how vulnerable your systems really are. And that can sometimes be quite painful – but that's exactly what makes it so valuable.
The video is only loaded from YouTube when you play it – data (including your IP address) is then transmitted to YouTube/Google. More in the privacy policy
Because a good pentest shows you not only where gaps are, but how they could be exploited – from the open admin console to the SQL injection in your customer portal. This isn't about generic vulnerability scanners, but about real attacks under controlled conditions. That's how you find out how well your defenses really stand up in an emergency.
Important point: you shouldn't test only after an incident. The best time for a pentest is before launch, after major changes or at regular intervals – depending on the industry, even mandatory. Especially if you work with sensitive data, payment processes or critical infrastructure.
If you want to know how such a test works, what variants there are and what is examined – you'll find a clear overview on this page about pentesting.
3. Typical vulnerabilities that pentests relentlessly uncover
You think your systems are airtight because you have strong passwords and a firewall? Unfortunately, that's not enough. Pentests keep showing the same classics – gaps that creep in through everyday stress, missing updates or wrong assumptions. Here are a few examples from practice:
1. Open ports and services that no one uses anymore
There's still an outdated FTP server running that was replaced long ago – but forgotten. Or a test system that suddenly became productive without proper protection. Attackers love exactly this kind of legacy baggage.
2. Default passwords and weak logins
Admin:admin, test:test or Passwort123 – yes, these still exist. Often in internal tools, on router interfaces or in monitoring services. Whoever gains access there immediately has deep insight.
3. Misconfigured permissions and shares
A pentest shows you when your trainee suddenly has access to all customer data – or when your publicly accessible directory contains sensitive PDFs that should never have gone outside.
4. Unpatched software and outdated systems
An outdated WordPress plugin, an old Java version on the server or an unpatched mail service – a feast for attackers. A pentest uncovers exactly such vulnerabilities.
Web applications in particular are a popular target. A good pentest specifically tests for these typical entry points – automated and manual.
In short: a pentest makes visible what escapes you in everyday life. And that's worth its weight in gold – as long as you act on it afterwards.
4. Process of a professional penetration test
A good pentest doesn't go by the motto “let's just hack in real quick” – it follows a structured process that documents exactly what was tested, how it was approached and what results came out. Here is the typical process in five phases:
1. Kick-off & goal definition
It starts with the briefing: What should be tested? A web portal? The internal network? The entire infrastructure? Together with the pentest team, you determine which systems will be examined, which test types (e.g., black box, grey box, white box) come into question and what is off-limits (e.g., production systems without backup).
2. Information gathering (reconnaissance)
Now it begins: the testers collect publicly available information about your domain, your hosting, the technologies used and vulnerabilities. This also includes scanning your systems for open ports, running services or conspicuous versions.
3. Analysis & vulnerability identification
Here it is uncovered what is truly problematic. Outdated software, missing authentication, configuration errors, publicly accessible admin interfaces – everything is noted, classified and prioritized. Automated tools are often used for this as well.
4. Exploitation (controlled exploitation)
Now comes the critical point: can the discovered vulnerabilities actually be exploited in practice? The testers attempt, in a controlled manner, to gain access to systems – e.g., via SQL injections, brute-force attacks or privilege escalation. Everything is carefully documented – without causing damage.
5. Reporting & debriefing
At the end you receive a detailed report. Not an avalanche of technical jargon, but a clear presentation: What was found, how critical is it, how can it be fixed? There is usually also a final discussion – so you know where you stand and what to do next.
5. Internal vs. external pentest: What makes sense when?
Not every attack comes from outside – and not every security gap is visible from outside. That's exactly why good pentests distinguish between external and internal tests. Both have their place – and you should know when each makes sense.
External pentest: Attack from outside
Here the testers simulate what a hacker could do who has no access to your network. They examine publicly accessible systems such as web servers, APIs, email gateways or remote desktop access. Goal: find out whether someone can gain access from outside – and how far they get with it.
Makes sense if:
you operate web applications or customer portals
you use remote access (VPN, RDP, SSH)
you want to know your internet attack surface
Internal pentest: Attack from inside
Here it's about what can happen if an attacker has made it into the network – or an employee accidentally becomes a security gap. The testers, with internal access, check whether sensitive systems can be compromised or privileges expanded.
Makes sense if:
you want to know the state of your internal access
you are implementing Zero Trust or Least Privilege (or want to)
you have already had an incident in the company
Conclusion: Ideally, you combine both variants – first the external view, then the in-depth check from inside. That way you get a complete picture of your security posture.
6. Reading pentest reports correctly – and acting on them
A good pentest does you no good if the final report gathers dust unread in a filing cabinet. What you need is a clear view of the results – and concrete measures that follow from them. Unfortunately, many reports are full of technical jargon, endless CVE lists and technical details that achieve little without context. So: how do you read such a thing properly?
1. Priorities first – what is really critical?
Every report should contain a risk rating. Use it! Critical gaps (e.g., remote code execution or database access without authentication) must be fixed immediately. Medium and low risks you can plan strategically – but never ignore.
2. Consider the context – is it realistically exploitable?
Not every gap is immediately dangerous. Perhaps an exploit would only be possible under certain conditions – or the affected service only runs internally. So also read the explanations for each vulnerability: where is the gap, how was it tested, and how easily could it be exploited in real life?
3. Take recommendations seriously – but also question them
Most reports contain concrete suggestions for remediation. Use this information – but also check whether it fits your infrastructure. Sometimes the recommended fix is technically correct but organizationally impractical. Then you need alternatives – and perhaps advice.
4. Document measures – for yourself and your team
Record what you fix, how and when. This helps not only with internal communication, but also toward audits, regulators or customers. Many pentest providers also offer a follow-up check – you should use it.
5. Plan the next test – security is a process
A pentest is not a one-off action. Use the report to better prepare future tests, adjust the scope or include other systems. The more structured your approach, the more you profit from each individual test.
7. Limits of pentests (and what else you should do)
As important as pentests are – they are not a cure-all. A pentest uncovers vulnerabilities, yes. But it always shows only a snapshot of your security posture. As soon as you change systems, set up new services or adjust configurations, your attack surface can change too.
1. No complete protection – but a targeted look
A pentest tests what you specify: certain systems, defined IP ranges, set time periods. Everything outside the scope is left out. This means: a gap in an untested part of your infrastructure may remain undiscovered.
2. Human factors are often left out
Pentests focus on technical gaps – social engineering, phishing, poor training or flawed processes are rarely part of the package. Yet many security problems arise exactly here: through carelessness or lack of awareness in everyday life.
3. Security measures without processes achieve nothing
A discovered flaw is only eliminated if you learn from it: improve processes, rethink permissions, tighten patch management, implement system hardening. Pentests provide impulses – but you have to act yourself (or your team).
4. Repetition is mandatory
Security is not a goal, but a process. A one-time test is nice, but not a protective shield for eternity. Depending on the industry and infrastructure, you should test regularly – at least once a year, better still with every major system change.
8. Bonus: Checklist “Am I ready for the next pentest?”
You want to get started with a pentest – or prepare the next one properly? Then go through this checklist. It helps you avoid unnecessary pitfalls and carry out the test efficiently:
✅ Goals defined?
Which systems should be tested? What is the scope – and what stays out?
✅ Test type selected?
External pentest? Internal? Or both combined? Clarity saves time – and money.
✅ Production system or test environment?
Will testing be live or in a mirrored environment? If live: are backups available?
✅ Approvals and contacts arranged?
Is the pentest team technically and legally covered? Who is available in case of incidents?
✅ Monitoring and logging prepared?
Do you want to see whether your system reacts to attacks? Then logging and alerts should be active.
✅ Update and patch level current?
Outdated software brings many findings – but little insight. Patch first, then test.
✅ Employees informed?
At least key people should know that testing is taking place – otherwise there will be trouble with the admin team.
✅ Measures planned after the test?
Who reads the report, who evaluates the findings, who takes care of implementation?